LifeDev

It’s funny sometimes how sensitive we are about our weaknesses. Nobody wants to admit they have any, yet everyone knows they do. And believe me, if you think you don’t have any, people around you will surely find some.

Anyone else seen the initial tryouts to American Idol each season? There is no shortage of people who can’t sing see their weaknesses in this beautiful country.

Yes, everybody wants to believe that they’re incredible at everything. But if this were really true, what would it look like?

To use bloggers as an example, this would mean that not only are you a killer writer, you know just how to promote the snot out of your site and can create a killer design for your blog. And all of these things will be equally high quality. Not likely.

In a perfect world, this could happen. People could be great at everything. (And I’d have that pony I’ve been wanting since childhood.) But in reality hardly anybody falls into this category. Actually, this qualifies them for another category- “freak of nature”.

If you’re going to be productive, you have to concentrate on your strengths. If you spend all of your time trying to improve your weakness, your strengths will decrease, and your weaknesses will probably become mediocre. So you’ll be all around mediocre.

Contract Worker shows us the 70/20/10 model (popularized by Eric Schmidt) for developing those mad professional skills. A writer using the model would:

1. Spend 70% of his time writing. Or making a living.
2. 20% maintaining his equipment, replenishing supplies, making new contacts, or other activities that support the craft.
3. 10% on what may seem unrelated, but ultimately beneficial for the freelancer. Such as investing what he’s earned into money-making assets. Or looking for new ways to maximize your abilities.

Note that there isn’t a “spend 30% of his time becoming mediocre at something he’s really crappy at”. There’s a reason for this.

If everybody was mediocre, there would be no Bill Gates or Steve Jobs or Jim Hensons or Abe Lincolns or <insert your name here>. We need people with flaws just as much as we need the people with great attributes. Flaws mean that no matter how bad we are at one aspect of life, we’re equally as good (if not better) at something else. And that we can always find someone who is skilled in our weaknesses. And vice-versa.

Forget about the weaknesses, develop the strengths.

[Props to Rico]

Like what you're reading? Stop by and say howdy on Twitter!